InwyResearch

Studies · 12 of 13

Smaller venues

If providing liquidity is the edge, smaller venues with fewer professionals should pay more. Do they?

Rejected
The question

Do smaller venues pay more for providing liquidity?

The answer

Nothing beats the benchmark; small venues have little real flow

DataDefiLlama yields and TVL histories; public venue APIs
TestLike-for-like yields over 12 months; real flow visible in the APIs
The details

Two families were screened: smaller prediction markets where the longshot strategy could run with less competition, and “be the house” vaults on smaller perp exchanges.

House vaults

Average annual yield, last twelve monthsStablecoin vaults and lending, like for like (no price exposure)
Exchange market-making vault (benchmark)+15%
Smaller exchange’s stablecoin vault+11%
Stablecoin lending (typical)+6%

A smaller exchange’s vault advertised 42% — a spike; its twelve-month average was 11%. A brand-new venue’s pools showed 35–200%+, driven by launch incentives and highly unstable.

Smaller prediction markets

Total value locked: the market leader holds over $300M; the next ones $21M, $10M and $3M, the rest under $2.5M. What their own public APIs showed:

A maker edge needs retail buyers. What these venues really offer is incentives — rebates, rewards and pre-token points — which cannot be backtested.