InwyResearch

Studies · 09 of 13

Crypto price targets vs options

The most promising idea of the study — until the holdout. A cautionary tale about one good window.

Failed holdout
The question

Does options-implied fair value sharpen the longshot edge on crypto targets?

The answer

Strong in discovery, nothing in the holdout

Data638 events, 2.2M trades; Deribit implied volatility at every trade
TestDiscovery Mar–Oct 2026; holdout Jan 2025–Feb 2026, rules committed first
The details

Polymarket’s “What price will Bitcoin hit?” and “Bitcoin above X on date” markets trade tens of millions of dollars, much of it retail buying dramatic targets. Unlike most prediction markets, their fair value can be computed: the options market prices crypto volatility professionally. The idea was to sell longshot “Yes” only where it was overpriced against options-implied odds.

Return per fill — discovery vs holdoutSame code, same thresholds; the holdout data was fetched only after the rules were committed
Discovery 2026Holdout 2025–26
Overpriced vs options+10.3%
−1.0%
Model-only rule, wider range+24.5%
+3.8%
No model (plain longshots)+3.6%
−1.8%
Discovery Holdout
Overpriced vs options +10.3% −1.0% (t = −0.3)
Model-only rule +24.5% +3.8% (t = 0.6)
Model accuracy vs market model better tie

In discovery the model even beat the market’s own prices on accuracy, and held up in a month when BTC rallied 25%. But the discovery months were a calm regime, in which bitcoin moved less than options expected — that is what the model was really harvesting. Over fourteen months that included a sharp sell-off, the “BTC drops to X” tickets paid out.

Without the pre-registered test, this would have been built on.