InwyResearch

Research log · 2026

We tested ~30 crypto trading ideas. Two held up.

An open research log. Thirteen studies and some thirty strategy ideas, each tested against real market data before any capital was committed — and the two that survived data they had never seen.

Survived unseen dataRejected, or only useful as a toolHover or tap a tile for its name

The two that survived

Both held up on data they had never seen. Short version first; every claim links to its full study.

What the combination earned

Growth of 100, mid-2023 to late 2026. A slow trend rule plus market-making yield beat each part alone.

Growth of 100, mid-2023 to late 2026Monthly, after fees and funding. Hover for values.
Trend + carryTrend, parked in cashMarket-making vaultBTC buy-and-hold
01002003004005006002023202420252026Trend + carry 553

Why most ideas died

Ideas are cheap; surviving unseen data is not.

~30ideas tested

Each had a structural or behavioural reason to work. Most were killed by a cheap check on real data.

4pre-registered holdouts

Rules written down first, then run once on data nobody had looked at.

2survived

Only these two were built, and first in dry-run, with no money at risk.

How every idea was tested

Guilty until proven innocent: five gates, and most ideas never got past the second.

  1. 1. IdeaA reason an edge should exist: someone is forced, biased, or paid to take the other side.
  2. 2. Cheap kill-checkReal venue data, a control group, medians and “without the best outcome”.
  3. 3. Live book checkIs the price actually tradable in today’s order book, or the mid-point of an empty one?
  4. 4. Pre-registered holdoutRules committed first. Unseen data touched once.
  5. 5. SurvivorOnly now does anything get built.

All thirteen studies

Each page gives the one-line answer first, then the details.

What the failures taught